For a number of decades I’ve been interested in self-improvement via a method I like to call metaprogramming. I was first exposed to the term via John C. Lilly’s Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer (a summary report to Lilly’s employer at the time, The National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH]). Lilly explored the idea that all human behavior is controlled by genetic and neurological programs, and that via intense introspection, psychedelic drugs, and isolation tanks, human beings can learn to reprogram their own computers. Far out, man. As the fields of psychology, neurophysiology, cognitive science have progressed, we’ve learned that the computer/brain analogy has its limitations. As for psychedelics, they have their limitations as well; they are so effective at disrupting rigid mental structures (opening up minds), that they can leave their heavy users a bit lacking in structure. From my own observations, what the heavy user of psychedelics stands to gain in creativity, he may lose in productivity, or stability, or coherence.
Those issues aside, I still love the term metaprogramming. We are creatures of habit (programs), and one of the most effective (if not only) way we can modify our own behavior is by hacking our own habits. We can program our programs, thus, metaprogramming. This is a slightly different use of the term than Lilly’s; what I call metaprogramming he probably would have called selfmetaprogramming (he used metaprograms to refer to higher level programs in the human biocomputer; habits and learned knowledge and cultural norms as opposed to instincts and other “hardwired” behaviors).
Effective Metaprogramming
Effective metaprogramming requires a degree of self-awareness and self-observation. It also requires a forgiving attitude towards oneself; we can more clearly observe and take responsibility for our own behaviors (including the destructive ones), if we refrain from unnecessary self-flagellation.
Most importantly, effective metaprogramming requires clear targets for behavior. In my experience, coming up with these targets takes an enormous amount of time and energy. It’s hard to decide how you want to behave, in every area of your life. It’s much easier to just continue on cruise control, relying on your current set of habits to carry you towards whatever fate you’re currently pointed at.
And what if you pick a target for your own behavior, implement it, and don’t like the results? Course corrections are part of the territory.
Religion (Do It Our Way)
If you don’t want to come up with your own set of behavioral guidelines, there’s always someone willing to offer (or sell) you theirs. Moses, lugging around his ten commandments, or Tony Robbins, with his DVDs.
Looks like we might be down to five commandments.
I’m an atheist, more or less, and a fan of the scientific method and scientific inquiry. I also appreciate the work the philosopher/evolutionary biologists Daniel Dennett and Richard Dawkins, both of whom have taken up strong stands against organized religion. These stands are excusable, insofar as they attack outmoded religious beliefs (creationism, the afterlife, inferiority of women, and so forth) or crime (like the abuse of children by priests — Dawkins is actually trying to arrest the Pope). But religion offers much more than belief, and in some religions (like Judaism) belief matters very little. Religions offer behavioral systems, practices, rituals, myths, stories, and traditions, all of which are tremendous, irreplaceable cultural resources.
Daniel Dennett, aka Santa Claus.
As much as I value religions in the abstract, I haven’t yet found one I can deal with personally. My wife finds the endless rules of Judaism to be invigorating; following them gives her real spiritual satisfaction. I find them to be bizarre and confusing (maybe this is because I’m not Jewish, but I suspect some Jews would agree with me).
Still, I have liberally borrowed from the world’s religions while devising my own metaprogramming system. Jesus’s Golden Rule. Islam’s dislike of debt. A good chunk of the Buddha’s Eightfold Path. And at least a few of the Ten Commandments.
Help Yourself
Want to win friends and influence people? Change the spelling of your last
name to match that of a world-famous captain of industry!
The modern self-help movement has had its share of both inspired individuals (like Tony Robbins) and charismatic but ultimately abusive (like the late Frederick Lenz).
I’m a fan of Robbins, for example, because his teachings are open (he does sell products and seminars, but he also gives away an enormous amount of content). Same goes for Steve Pavlina, Les Brown, and even Timothy Ferriss. All offer up their own insights and behavioral modification (metaprogramming) systems with a “try this and see if it works for you” attitude. It’s clear they are interested in spreading their message first, in making a living second, and not at all interested in controlling people or accumulating subjugates.
I’m also fascinated by the late anti-guru U.G. Krishnamurti (not to be confused with the more popular J. Krishnamurti). U.G., by all accounts, was unequivocally an enlightened being. The interesting bit was his absolute refusal to attempt to teach, pass on, or even recommend his own higher state of consciousness. Throughout his life, he refused to take on any followers or officially publish any of his writings. I’ll write about U.G. in more detail in another post.
Frederick Lenz -- charismatic but mad as a hatter.
Sinister Intentions
At the unfortunate intersection between religion and self-help lies the world of cults. Cult leaders and cult organizations can be spotted by the following attributes. Stay away!
- secret, often bizarre teachings
- brainwashing techniques (sleep deprivation, emotional trauma, isolation, sensory overload)
- enormous fees required for membership and/or access to teachings
- requirement to cut off contact from family and/or friends (nonmembers)
- use coercive methods to control their members (intimidation, blackmail, even violence)
NEVER challenge a hack sci-fi writer to invent a religion -- he might succeed!
There’s nothing wrong with using somebody else’s self-improvement/behavioral modification/metaprogramming system, either ancient or modern, in whole or in part, as long as you shop around carefully. Or, you can invent your own. As a third alternative, if you are already happy with the current state of your habits (and where they are steering you in life), you may not feel compelled to bother with changing yourself.
Baby with the Bathwater
The field of self-improvement is full of half-truths, hucksters, pseudoscience, charlatans, snake oil and snake oil salesmen, bizarre beliefs, true believers, smelly hippies, narcissistic baby boomers, pitiful cases, get-rich-quick schemers, crystal wavers, cult leaders, and weird dieters, and is thus always ripe for parody (my favorite is this video parody of The Secret). A down-to-earth, rational person could be excused for steering clear of the self-improvement realm altogether.
On the other hand, energy we invest in improving our own habits (programs), including habits of thought and perception, is probably one of the best investments we can make in our own lives. Even minor improvements can yield enormous dividends in the long-run.
I’ll continue to share my thoughts about metaprogramming in this blog, including my core metaprogramming principles (not as a prescriptive, but rather in the spirit of open-source code sharing). As a quick preview, I’ll offer that my own principles involve the following areas:
- Maintaining a High Quality of Consciousness
- Taking Radical Responsibility for All Your Actions, and Every Aspect Of Your Life
- Creating a System of Functional Vitality
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.