Thursday, June 23, 2011
Saturday, June 18, 2011
Friday, June 17, 2011
LEGAL VERDICT: MANMADE GLOBAL WARMING SCIENCE DOESN’T WITHSTAND SCRUTINY
This is an article that I originally published on my old "Mikiverse" page back on June 13th 2010 and is being relocated to make it easier for you to access and utilise these older articles.
Mikiverse Science.
By Lawrence Solomon June 6, 2010
A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fails to stand up to scrutiny.
The cross-examination, carried out by Jason Scott Johnston, Professor and Director of the Program on Law, Environment and Economy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, found that “on virtually every major issue in climate change science, the [reports of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and other summarizing work by leading climate establishment scientists have adopted various rhetorical strategies that seem to systematically conceal or minimize what appear to be fundamental scientific uncertainties or even disagreements.”
Professor Johnson, who expressed surprise that the case for global warming was so weak, systematically examined the claims made in IPCC publications and other similar work by leading climate establishment scientists and compared them with what is found in the peer-edited climate science literature.
He found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it “seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.” Financial Post LawrenceSolomon@nextcity.com Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe the author of The Deniers.
Mikiverse Science.
By Lawrence Solomon June 6, 2010
A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fails to stand up to scrutiny.
The cross-examination, carried out by Jason Scott Johnston, Professor and Director of the Program on Law, Environment and Economy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, found that “on virtually every major issue in climate change science, the [reports of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and other summarizing work by leading climate establishment scientists have adopted various rhetorical strategies that seem to systematically conceal or minimize what appear to be fundamental scientific uncertainties or even disagreements.”
Professor Johnson, who expressed surprise that the case for global warming was so weak, systematically examined the claims made in IPCC publications and other similar work by leading climate establishment scientists and compared them with what is found in the peer-edited climate science literature.
He found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it “seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.” Financial Post LawrenceSolomon@nextcity.com Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe the author of The Deniers.
IT'S SPACE OR BUST-HAWKING
This is an article that I originally published on my old "Mikiverse" page back on August 10th 2010 and is being relocated to make it easier for you to access and utilise these older articles.
Michael, Member of the House of Byers, Editor-In-Chief, Mikiverse Science.
Yahoo!7 August 10, 2010, 9:36 am
Michael, Member of the House of Byers, Editor-In-Chief, Mikiverse Science.
Yahoo!7 August 10, 2010, 9:36 am
Astrophysicist Stephen Hawking says the human race must colonise space in the next 200 years or face extinction.
In an interview with website Big Think the astrophysicist said he fears mankind is in great danger and it needs to colonise space in order to survive.
Professor Hawking argues threats to the human race, such as the 1963 Cuban missile crisis, will only increase in the future and plans should be established in order to deal with them.
"We shall need great care and judgment to negotiate them all successfully," he was quoted as saying.
"But I'm an optimist. If we can avoid disaster for the next two centuries, our species should be safe, as we spread into space."
He also warns increases in population and limited resources are making life on Earth more dangerous and the only way to capitalise on the progress of the last century was to move into space and towards the rest of the galaxy.
"That is why I'm in favour of manned, or should I say 'personed' [sic], space flight," he said.
Professor Hawking has previously warned that space exploration would not be without risk for humans.
So too, he has warned against humans making contact with aliens who he says mat not necessarily be friendly.
In an interview with website Big Think the astrophysicist said he fears mankind is in great danger and it needs to colonise space in order to survive.
Professor Hawking argues threats to the human race, such as the 1963 Cuban missile crisis, will only increase in the future and plans should be established in order to deal with them.
"We shall need great care and judgment to negotiate them all successfully," he was quoted as saying.
"But I'm an optimist. If we can avoid disaster for the next two centuries, our species should be safe, as we spread into space."
He also warns increases in population and limited resources are making life on Earth more dangerous and the only way to capitalise on the progress of the last century was to move into space and towards the rest of the galaxy.
"That is why I'm in favour of manned, or should I say 'personed' [sic], space flight," he said.
Professor Hawking has previously warned that space exploration would not be without risk for humans.
So too, he has warned against humans making contact with aliens who he says mat not necessarily be friendly.
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
RICHARD FEYNMAN-THE CHARACTER OF PHYSICAL LAW-THE LAW OF GRAVITATION FULL VERSION
PART 1
PART 2
PART 3
PART 4
PART 5
PART 6
PART 7
PART 2
PART 3
PART 4
PART 5
PART 6
PART 7
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)